I am so fed up with BbL it’s kind of pathetic. My most recent gripe: BbL seems to be unable to do basic math… in test items designed to create math questions.
I created a “calculated formula” question as part of a self-test of my undergraduate statistics students’ math preparedness. The question asks the students to evaluate this expression (with variables generated by random processes):
([a] – [b])2 – [c] + ([d]2 + [f])
Looking at the randomly-generated values, I checked the answer on this variant:
(6 – 5)2 – 7 + (72 + 4) –> I calculated 47. BbL said it was -59.
BbL seems to be solving the expression like this:
(6 - 5)2 - 7 + (72 + 4)
(1)2 - 7 + (49 + 4)
1 - 7 + 53 <-- So far, so good
1 - 60 <-- Oh no! Working right-to-left!
I’ve been trying to get some graphs prepared from the Knowledge & Attitudes data from Fall 2012 (K&A 2012). One of our chunks of data was a series of questions given to survey respondents about their views of the immorality and probable harm caused by various sexual situations (I call these the scenarios): each scenario specified an initiator, a recipient (for lack of a better term), and the age (15 or 21) and sex of each. The initiator was described as “starting a sexual relationship” with the recipient. They always engaged in the same activities: kissing and touching each other’s genitals. There are a lot of variables. Here’s one way to look at them:
- Initiator sex
- Initiator age (2 levels: 15 or 21 years old)
- Recipient sex
- Recipient age (15 or 21)
- Immorality rating (DV)
- Harm rating (DV)
To make things slightly more complex, I simplified the survey forms by cutting out some of the potential crossings of the variables: initiator and perpetrator sex are fully crossed (M/M, M/F, F/M, and F/F conditions) but the ages aren’t–15-year-old initiators are always paired with 21-year-old recipients, and vice-versa. For analysis (but possibly not graphing) purposes it’s also important to know that some comparisons happened between subjects (there were two more-or-less randomly-assigned forms) and others within subjects, with the order of presentation (sadly) fixed. In the future I may do this with more rigorous crossing of all the variables.
I could present subsets of variables in graphs, but I’m really interested in getting as many (independent) variables as possible represented in a single chart, not least because I expect higher-order interactions, and only showing a few variables might obscure those or even mislead the viewer. Here’s an initial stab with only some of the variables:
Dear SPSS (or PASW or whatever you call yourself these days),
It’s not working out. For the past few years I’ve tried to pretend everything was all right–and even before that I wasn’t completely satisfied, but I never really expected to be, because there’s no such thing as a perfect statistics application, right? So who’s to say what’s “good enough” in this crazy, mixed-up world? Maybe my standards are too high if I’m not content with your admittedly vast array of analytical features. I guess what I’m trying to say is, It’s not you; it’s me. Continue reading